Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In with Google Sign In with OpenID

However none of the previous studies used Puma knock-out or knock-down systems to prove the involvem

This is not only shown with established Puma-/- cells, which may possibly have acquired mutations in other genes major to apoptosis resistance, but also in freshly ASP-2215 site geared up cells in which Puma was downregulated by shRNA. Anti-actin as loading and anti-SFV-C as an infection AS605240 site controls in (B). The p values are the pursuing: 3T9 sh-Puma versus 3T9 sh-Ctrl: p = .008 for six h, p < 0.001 for 14 and 24 h SV40 TAg sh-Puma versus SV40 TAg sh-Ctrl and 3T9 Puma-/- versus 3T9 WT: p < 0.001 for 6, 14 and 24 h, n = 4. (B) Annexin-V/ PI FACS analysis of WT, Puma-/- and Bax/Bax-/- FDM cells infected with 10 moi of SFV for 0, 14, 24 or 36 h (hpi). Data are the means of at least three independent experiments using three different clones of WT, Puma-/- and Bax/Bak-/- cells SEM. The p values are the following: Puma-/- versus WT: p = 0.03 for 14 h, p < 0.001 for 24 and 36 h. Bax/Bak-/- versus WT: p = 0.01 for 14 h, p < 0.001 for 24 and 36 h, n = 4. was suppressed by antibodies directed towards Fas or FasL [47,48]. Moreover, gD and gJ of HSV-1 were shown to protect against FasL-induced apoptosis [17,18] and dendritic cells seem to die after HSV-1 infection due to the downregulation of the caspase-8 inhibitor c-FLIP [28]. However, all these findings provided only indirect evidence for or against a role of FasL/Fas signalling in HSV-1-induced apoptosis and the other death receptor signalling systems have not been studied. Here we used neutralizing antibodies or recombinant Fc proteins to clearly show that neither FasL, TNF, TRAIL nor their receptors were required for the death of HSV-1-infected cells. We previously published that this was also not the case for SFV [32]. Finally, we used the RIP1 inhibitor necrostatin-1 and shRNA-mediated downregulation of RIP3 to exclude Fig 11. SFV enhances Puma mRNA and protein levels in MEFs and FDM cells, but mRNA increase is late and Bax/Bak-dependent. (A) Quantitative/ real time reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) of Puma mRNA isolated from SV40 TAg WT and Bax/Bak-/- MEFs infected with 10 moi of SFV for 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 14, 18 or 24 h (hpi). The mRNA values were normalized to the ribosomal housekeeping 18S gene and depicted as 2-Ct relative to mock cells (see Materials and Methods for details). Data are the means of at least three independent experiments SEM. The p values are the following: SFV-treated WT versus untreated: p = 0.005 for 6 h, p = 0.01 for 8 h, p = 0.008 for 10 h. SFV-treated Bax/Bak-/- versus untreated: not significant, n = 5. (B) Anti-Puma, anticaspase-3 (pro-caspase-3 and cleaved caspase-3) and anti-PARP western blot analysis of total cell extracts of SV40 TAg WT MEFs infected with SFV for 0, 2, 6, 8, 10 or 18 h. Anti-actin as loading control the participation of necroptosis in HSV-1-induced cell death. We can therefore not confirm a recent report by Wang et al. [49] that HSV-1 triggers necrosis/necroptosis via RIP3, at least not in our cellular systems. Our study therefore shows that Puma is the major sentinel/sensor of incoming viruses to convey an apoptotic signal to MOMP.
Sign In or Register to comment.